Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on bone metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

NCT number

SGLT2 inhibitor

Background therapy

Sample size

Male

(%)

Mean Age (year)

Mean HbA1c (%)

Mean BMI (kg/m²)

Follow up (weeks)

Bolinder et al. (2014) [11]

NCT00855166

DAPA: 10 mg

MET

180

55.6

60.7

7.2

31.9

102

Bailey et al. (2014) [12]

NCT00528372

DAPA: 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg

Naive treatment

274

48.2

52.2

7.9

NR

102

Kohan et al. (2013) [13]

NCT00663260

DAPA: 5 mg, 10 mg

OAD

252

65.1

67.0

8.4

NR

104

Rosenstock et al. (2012) [14]

NCT00683878

DAPA: 5 mg, 10 mg

PIOG

420

49.5

53.5

8.4

NR

48

Wilding et al. (2012) [15]

NCT00673231

DAPA: 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg

INS ± OAD

807

47.8

59.3

8.5

33.1

48

Araki et al. (2017) [16]

NCT02157298

DAPA: 5 mg

INS ± OAD

182

70.9

58.1

8.4

26.6

16

Schumm et al. (2015) [17]

NCT01217892

DAPA: 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg

MET

400

44.9

57.7

7.8

32.6

16

Wilding et al. (2013) [18]

NCT01117584

IPRA: 50 mg

MET

134

50.7

58

7.7

31.5

12

Lu et al. (2016) [19]

NCT01505426

IPRA: 50 mg

MET

170

45.3

53

7.7

26.8

24

Han et al. (2018) [20]

NCT02452632

IPRA: 50 mg

MET + SIT

139

49.6

57.5

7.9

25.8

24

Fonseca et al. (2013) [21]

NCT01071850

IPRA: 50 mg

OAD

136

48.5

53

8

31.5

12

Min et al. (2017) [22]

NCT01505426

IPRA: 50 mg

MET

82

46.3

56.1

7.6

25.8

24

Kashiwagi et al. (2015) [23]

NCT01057628

IPRA: 50 mg

OAD

129

69.8

59.4

8.3

25.5

16

Gallo et al. (2019) [24]

NCT02033889

ERTU: 5 mg,

15 mg

GLIM

621

46.4

56.6

8.1

31.1

104

Ji et al. (2015) [25]

NCT01381900

CANA: 100 mg, 300 mg

MET ± SU

676

53.6

56.2

8

25.7

18

Bilezikian et al. (2016) [26]

NCT01106651

CANA: 100 mg, 300 mg

OAD

714

55.5

63.6

7.7

31.6

104

Yale et al. (2014) [27]

NCT01064414

CANA: 100 mg, 300 mg

SU or INS

269

60.6

68.5

8.0

33.0

52

Rosenstock et al. (2012) [28]

NCT00642278

CANA: 100 mg, 300 mg

MET

193

53.4

52.4

7.8

31.3

12

Rodbard et al. (2016) [29]

NR

CANA: 100 mg, 300 mg

MET + SIT

213

56.8

57.4

8.5

32.0

26

Sha et al. (2014) [30]

NCT01483781

CANA: 300 mg

OAD

36

86.1

62.8

7.7

29.8

12

Usiskin et al. (2014) [34]

NCT01081834 NCT01106625 NCT01106677 NCT01106690

CANA: 100 mg, 300 mg

OAD

2313

49.5

55.9

8

32.1

26

Sone et al. (2020) [31]

NCT02589639

EMPA: 10 mg, 25 mg

INS ± OAD

269

72.6

58.7

8.8

26.9

16

Kohler et al. (2018) [35]

NCT01289990

NCT01210001NCT01177813NCT01164501NCT00789035NCT00749190NCT0088511 NCT01011868NCT01947855NCT01193218NCT01370005NCT01306214;

NCT01131676

EMPA: 10 mg, 25 mg

OAD

12,620

64.8

60.6

8.1

30.4

78

Rau et al. (2022) [32]

EudraCT: 2016-000172-19

EMPA: 10 mg

OAD

42

81.0

62.0

7.7

31.3

3month

Kullmann et al. (2022) [33]

NCT03227484

EMPA: 25 mg

OAD

40

40.0

59.9

5.7

31.5

8

  1. BMI: body mass index; DAPA: dapagliflozin; IPRA: Ipragliflozin; ERTU: ertugliflozin; CANA: canagliflozin; EMPA: empagliflozin; MET: metformin; OAD: oral antidiabetic drugs; PIOG: pioglitazone; INS: insulin; SIT: sitagliptin; GLIM: Glimepiride; SU: sulfonylureas; NR: not reported