Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effect of metformin in addition to an antenatal diet and lifestyle intervention on fetal growth and adiposity: the GRoW randomised trial

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 20, Article number: 139 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The infants born to women who are overweight or obese in pregnancy are at an increased risk of being born macrosomic or large for gestational age. Antenatal dietary and lifestyle interventions have been shown to be ineffective at reducing this risk. Our aim was to examine the effects of metformin in addition to a diet and lifestyle intervention on fetal growth and adiposity among women with a BMI above the healthy range.

Methods

Women who had a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 in early pregnancy, and a singleton gestation, were enrolled in the GRoW trial from three public maternity hospitals in metropolitan Adelaide. Women were invited to have a research ultrasounds at 28 and 36 weeks’ gestation at which ultrasound measures of fetal biometry and adiposity were obtained. Fetal biometry z-scores and trajectories were calculated. Measurements and calculations were compared between treatment groups. This secondary analysis was pre-specified.

Results

Ultrasound data from 511 women were included in this analysis. The difference in femur length at 36 weeks’ gestation was (0.07 cm, 95% CI 0.01–0.14 cm, p = 0.019) and this was was statistically significant, however the magnitude of effect was small. Differences between treatment groups for all other fetal biometry measures, z-scores, estimated fetal weight, and adiposity measures at 28 and 36 weeks’ gestation were similar.

Conclusions

The addition of metformin to dietary and lifestyle advice in pregnancy for overweight and obese women has no clinically relevant effect on ultrasound measures of fetal biometry or adiposity.

Trial registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12612001277831).

Peer Review reports

Background

Women commencing pregnancy overweight or obese, defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m2 and ≥ 30 kg/m2, respectively,have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. These adverse outcomes include gestational diabetes (GDM) [1, 2] and hypertensive disorders, including pre-eclampsia [1, 2], during pregnancy and an increased risk of both induction of labour [1, 3] and birth by caesarean section [1, 4]. In developed countries, overweight and obesity effects approximately 50% of women of reproductive age [5,6,7].

Infants born to women who are overweight or obese are at increased risk of being born macrosomic or large for gestational age (LGA) [1, 8,9,10], of birth trauma including shoulder dystocia [10, 11], low Apgar scores, requiring resuscitation at birth [1, 8, 10], hypoglycaemia [12, 13] and requiring neonatal intensive care admission [1, 8, 12]. Longer term, maternal overweight and obesity are independent risk factors for childhood obesity [14,15,16], which may be partially mediated through an increased risk of infant macrosomia [17].

Antenatal dietary and lifestyle interventions have not been effective in reducing the risk of adverse clinical pregnancy and birth outcomes [18,19,20]. In particular, such interventions have not reduced infant birthweight or risk of an infant born LGA [18].

Oral metformin, a commonly used insulin sensitising agent, has been evaluated as a strategy to improve pregnancy outcomes for overweight and obese women, given similarities in the metabolic environment between both obesity and GDM. However, studies investigating the effects of antenatal metformin have either not reported growth and development in utero [21], or been limited in their analyses [22], resulting in a dearth of information about the fetal effects of antenatal metformin use.

Our group performed a randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of antenatal metformin therapy as an adjuvant to diet and lifestyle advice for women who were overweight or obese in early pregnancy [23]. We have previously reported that adjuvant antenatal metformin therapy is not associated with any differences in birth weight or risk of infants being born large for gestational age [23]. However, whether adjuvant antenatal metformin therapy has an effect on fetal growth, adiposity, and growth velocity, is not known. The aim of this pre-specified analysis of secondary outcomes was to investigate the effect of this combined antenatal intervention on fetal growth and adiposity.

Methods

Participants

The primary findings of the GRoW randomised trial [23] have been published. Women with a singleton, live gestation who were overweight or obese (BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2) and between 10 and 20 weeks’ gestation, were eligible to participate. Women with a multiple pregnancy, pre-existing type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, or a contraindication to taking metformin were excluded from the study.

Randomisation

Potentially eligible women were identified and recruited from three major public maternity hospitals in metropolitan Adelaide – the Women’s and Children’s Hospital, the Lyell McEwin Hospital, and Flinders Medical Centre. Informed consent was obtained. Randomisation used a central computer-based randomisation service, with variable blocks of four. Women were stratified according to parity (0 vs ≥1), BMI at booking visit (25–29.9 kg/m2 vs ≥30 kg/m2), and collaborating centre. Women, their caregivers, and research staff were blinded to treatment allocation.

Intervention

Participating women were randomised to either the metformin group or placebo group. Women recruited to the metformin group received a supply of oral metformin tablets (500 mg) and women allocated to the placebo group received a supply of placebo tablets identical in taste and appearance to the metformin tablets. All women were instructed to start taking one tablet per day increasing to a maximum of two tablets twice daily over four weeks as tolerated, and to continue over the course of the pregnancy [23].

All women received a dietary and lifestyle intervention over the course of the study, which we have described in detail previously [23]. This was an individually tailored intervention, and involved three face-to-face sessions over the course of pregnancy (the initial two with a dietitian, and one with a research assistant at 36 weeks’ gestation) and phone calls. Dietary advice was provided, in keeping with Australian dietary standards. This included maintaining a balance of carbohydrates, fat and protein, and reducing energy dense foods high in refined carbohydrates and saturated fats. Women were recommended to consume two servings of fruit, five servings of vegetables, and three servings of dairy each day. Women were encouraged to set and review achievable diet and lifestyle goals and self monitor their progress.

Ultrasound assessment

An accurate gestational age and estimated date of confinement was calculated for each woman based on early pregnancy ultrasound or last menstrual period. Women underwent a routine fetal anomaly scan at 18–20 weeks’ gestation, in keeping with South Australian Perinatal Practice Guidelines [24]. Participating women gave permission for fetal biometry results from this scan to be made available to the researchers. All women were invited to attend for a research ultrasound at 28 (range 26+ 0 to 29+ 6) and 36 (range 34+ 0 to 37+ 6) weeks’ gestation. A medical practitioner with specialist or subspecialist training in obstetric ultrasound performed all research ultrasounds, and was blinded to the woman’s allocated treatment group.

Fetal biometry measures

Fetal biometry measures collected from the routine fetal anomaly scan at 18–20 weeks’ gestation included standard measurements of head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). At the research ultrasounds, measurements of standard fetal biometry (HC, BPD, AC, and FL) were obtained in accordance with national and international standards of practice [25]. Biometry measures obtained from the research ultrasounds were converted into z scores to allow for variation in gestational age and fetal sex, using recognised Australian population standards [25, 26]. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated using the Hadlock C formula [27].

Fetal growth velocities

Fetal growth velocities are presented as the difference between 28 week measures and 36 week measures, calculated as total change / actual number of days between measurements. Velocity z-scores were likewise calculated using recognised Australian population standards where available [28].

Fetal adiposity measures

Fetal subcutaneous tissue fat thickness measurements were obtained at both research ultrasounds. These measurements included mid thigh lean mass (MTLM), mid thigh fat mass (MTFM), abdominal fat mass (AFM), and subscapular fat mass (SSFM), and were obtained by methods described previously [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Mid thigh total, lean and fat mass were obtained by taking a longitudinal view of the femur, then rotating the transducer through 90 degrees to obtain a cross-sectional view of the mid-thigh [30, 31]. MTFM was measured by taking the total cross-sectional limb area (MTTM) and subtracting MTLM (consisting of the central lean area comprising muscle and bone). Fetal AFM was measured at the level of the abdominal circumference, between fetal mid-axillary lines and anterior to the margins of the ribs [29, 30]. This was measured in millimetres and using magnification. The SSFM was obtained by a sagittal view of the fetal trunk, to view the entire longitudinal section of the scapula. The subcutaneous fat tissue measurement was taken at the level of the end of the scapula [30]. We have previously shown good inter-observer variability for these measurements in a similar cohort of women who were overweight or obese in early pregnancy [33].

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics of women included in the analysis were compared descriptively between treatment groups. Continuous variables were reported as means and standard deviations, or as medians and interquartile ranges if not normally distributed. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. Analyses were performed on available data on an intention-to-treat basis, with women analysed according to the treatment group into which they were randomised.

Outcomes measured at multiple time points were analysed using linear regression models, with Generalised Estimating Equations to account for correlation due to repeated measures, and a time-by-treatment interaction term to test for differences in treatment effect between time points. Estimates are reported as differences in means (metformin group – placebo group) and 95% confidence intervals for each time point separately, regardless of the significance of the interaction term. Growth velocity outcomes were analysed using linear regression models, with estimates again reported as differences in means (metformin group – placebo group) and 95% confidence intervals. Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed, with adjusted analyses including stratification variables (study centre, BMI category and parity), maternal age at trial entry, smoking status, and Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (SEIFA IRSD) quintile as covariates. All analyses were performed using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 524 women were recruited and randomised in the GRoW randomised trial, with 261 (49.8%) women randomised to the metformin group, and 263 (50.2%) women randomised to the placebo group. Overall, 10 women withdrew, underwent a termination of pregnancy, or suffered a miscarriage before 20 weeks’ gestation, resulting in a total of 256 women and their infants in the metformin group and 258 women and their infants in the placebo group who were included in primary analyses (Fig. 1). The present study includes a total of 511 women who attended for one or more research ultrasounds, 255 women from the metformin group and 256 women from the placebo group (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow of women eligible for inclusion in the analysis of ultrasound measurements of fetal growth and adiposity in the GRoW randomised trial

Full size image

Baseline demographic characteristics of participating women are shown in Table 1, and were comparable between treatment groups. The median gestational age at trial entry was 16.29 weeks (Interquartile Range (IQR) 14.43–18.00 weeks). The median BMI of the cohort was 32.30 kg/m2 (IQR 28.90–37.20 kg/m2), with most women in their second or subsequent pregnancy, non-smokers, and 62.63% from the highest two quintiles of social disadvantage [35]. These characteristics are similar to the full randomised cohort [23].

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of women recruited to the GRoW randomised trial who attended for one or more research ultrasounds
Full size table

Fetal biometry measures

There were no statistically significant differences in fetal biometry measures of BPD, HC or AC at any of the time points assessed (20 weeks’, 28 weeks’, and 36 weeks’ gestation; Table 2). Measurements of FL were not statistically significantly different at 20 or 28 weeks’ gestation (Table 2). Average femur length was statistically significantly greater in the metformin group at 36 weeks’ gestation, however the magnitude of the difference was small – only 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.14) cm. There were no statistically significant differences seen in calculated EFW at 28 or 36 weeks’ gestation, by treatment group (Table 2). The estimates of effect size for fetal biometry measures were all less than 0.50 cm and crossed zero (Table 2), suggesting that there were little to no absolute differences in average fetal biometry measures between the metformin and placebo groups, and that the true effect of treatment is not clinically relevant. Similarly, the estimated effect size on estimated fetal weight was only 17.61 (95% CI -57.67, 92.88) gm (Table 2), again suggesting a clinically relevant effect is unlikely.

Table 2 Effect of adjuvant metformin on ultrasound measures of fetal biometry over pregnancy
Full size table

In keeping with the above findings, there were no statistically significant differences in the fetal biometry z-scores of BPD, HC, FL or AC between the treatment groups, at any of the time points assessed (supplementary Table 1). There were no statistically significant differences in calculated estimated fetal weight z-score at 28 or 36 weeks’ gestation, by treatment group (supplementary Table 1). There was no evidence that the treatment effect differed between time points. All fetal biometry measure z-scores were positive in both groups, at all time points, suggesting the fetuses of women in our study were larger on average than the reference population used [26]. With regards to fetal biometry velocities and estimated fetal weight velocity, there were no statistically significant differences by treatment group, either in the raw velocity measurements or velocity for z-score (supplementary Table 2).

Fetal adiposity measures

There was no statistically significant treatment effect on any of the measures of fetal adiposity, at either 28 or 36 weeks’ gestation (Table 3). Estimates of effect size for all adiposity measures were close to zero, and the range of the 95% confidence intervals were small, suggesting a clinically meaningful effect is unlikely.

Table 3 Effect of adjuvant metformin treatment on ultrasound fetal adiposity measures over pregnancy
Full size table

Discussion

Main findings

Our findings demonstrate that, among pregnant women who are overweight or obese, antenatal treatment with oral metformin as an adjunct to dietary and lifestyle advice did not appreciably impact measures of fetal biometry or adiposity, or fetal biometry growth velocities over the third trimester of pregnancy.

Interpretation

Metformin has been used increasingly in the treatment of GDM. The Metformin in Gestational Diabetes (MiG) Trial confirmed the safety and efficacy of metformin use in women with GDM [21]. Oral metformin was not associated with an increased rate of a composite neonatal adverse outcome (made up of neonatal hypoglycaemia, respiratory distress, need for phototherapy, birth trauma, 5-min Apgar < 7, or preterm birth) [21], confirming its safety in pregnancy. Rowan et al also found no significant differences between metformin and insulin with regards to neonatal biometry, circumferences, or skin-fold thickness measurements [21].

Subsequent childhood follow up at two years of age, however, revealed selected differences with children exposed to metformin in pregnancy having statistically significantly greater upper arm circumference and subscapular and biceps skinfold thicknesses, and greater fat free mass measurements, in comparison with children exposed to insulin antenatally [36]. It was hypothesised that antenatal metformin caused fat to be stored in subcutaneous sites, resulting in less ectopic or visceral fat [36]. The MiG trial did not report fetal measures of growth and adiposity, however, and our findings refute this hypothesis, as adjuvant antenatal metformin started in the second trimester among women who were overweight or obese in early pregnancy was not associated with any differences in subcutaneous tissue fat measures results in our cohort. Women recruited to the MiG study had an average early pregnancy BMI of 32 kg/m2 [21], similar to women in the GRoW randomised cohort [23]. In contrast to the MiG study, however, women recruited to the GRoW randomised trial commenced treatment much earlier in pregnancy, with an average gestational age at trial entry of 16 weeks [23].

Our findings are in contrast to those reported in the PregMet2 randomised trial [37], investigating the effect of adjuvant antenatal metformin treatment among women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), starting in early pregnancy. While the primary outcome of this study was late miscarriage and preterm birth, fetal and neonatal biometry measures were performed in the third trimester and after birth as a secondary outcome [37]. This group found that the fetuses of women exposed to antenatal metformin had statistically significantly larger BPD measurements at 32 weeks’ gestation, and greater HC measurements at birth [22]. However, the magnitude of these differences was small – on average, less than one centimetre – and the authors concluded that these differences, while statistically significant, were not likely to be clinically relevant [37]. The population of women recruited to the PregMet2 randomised trial are different to those women recruited to the GRoW randomised trial, in that they all had a diagnosis of PCOS and, while the average BMI at trial entry was 29 kg/m2, this is lower than the average BMI at trial entry in the GRoW randomised trial, which was 32 kg/m2 [23]. This study was also smaller than the GRoW randomised trial, recruiting approximately half the number of the GRoW Trial.

Our work builds on that of two other published randomised trials investigating the effect of antenatal metformin among women who were obese in early pregnancy [38, 39]. The Effect of Metformin on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Obese Pregnant Women (EMPOWaR) randomised trial [38] randomised women with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 between 12 and 16 weeks’ gestation to receive either metformin up to 2.5 g per day or placebo. They found no significant difference in mean birthweight or birthweight z-score [38], similar to the primary outcome of the GRoW trial [23]. The second trial, Metformin in Obese Nondiabetic Pregnant Women (MOP) trial [39], randomised women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 between 12 and 18 weeks’ gestation, to metformin up to 3 g daily or placebo. Similarly, they found no statistically significant difference in birthweight z-score or incidence of neonatal LGA [39].

Our group has previously shown, in the LIMIT randomised trial [40], that an antenatal diet and lifestyle intervention in women who were overweight or obese was associated with greater fetal mean mid-thigh fat mass, and a significantly slower rate of subscapular adipose tissue deposition, with no difference in lean thigh mass or abdominal fat mass [33]. All women randomised to the GRoW trial were exposed to the same dietary and lifestyle intervention as was provided in the LIMIT randomised trial [40]. Of interest, results of fetal biometry z scores, estimated fetal weights and subcutaneous fat measures obtained from fetuses of women randomised to the GRoW trial placebo group were similar to those found in fetuses randomised to the diet and lifestyle group of the LIMIT randomised trial [40], providing further support for the robustness of our measurements in these very similar populations. While we have hypothesised previously that an antenatal diet and lifestyle intervention for women who were overweight or obese in early pregnancy may be associated with a more favourable fetal fat phenotype [33], our current findings do not suggest that there is any further effect on fetal adiposity with the addition of metformin to the aforementioned antenatal diet and lifestyle intervention. It is possible that the pathways involved in fetal fat deposition have been “saturated” by the effect of the diet and lifestyle intervention and cannot be further affected by the addition of metformin.

Women recruited to the GRoW randomised trial were, on average, 16 weeks’ gestation (Table 1). There is increasing evidence that the preconceptual period is of vital importance to healthy growth and development [41, 42]. Sovio and colleagues [43] demonstrated that the fetuses of women who were obese were more likely to have an abdominal circumference measurement greater than the 90th percentile which was already evident at 20 weeks’ gestation. It is possible that interventions need to be commenced prior to conception, to have an appreciable effect on fetal growth and adiposity.

Conclusions

Based on our study results, there is no evidence that the addition of metformin to dietary and lifestyle advice in pregnancy for overweight and obese women has a clinically relevant effect on ultrasound measures of fetal biometry or adiposity.

Availability of data and materials

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request and cannot be made publicly available, due to the nature of the data and the ethics approval obtained.

Abbreviations

GRoW randomised trial:

metformin and dietary advice to improve insulin sensitivity and promote gestational restriction of weight among pregnant women who are overweight or obese randomised trial

MoP study:

metformin in obese non-diabetes pregnant women randomised trial

MiG study:

metformin in gestational diabetes trial

LIMIT randomised trial:

limiting weight gain in overweight and obese women during pregnancy to improve health outcomes: a randomised trial

BMI:

body mass index

GDM:

gestational diabetes

LGA:

large for gestational age

HC:

head circumference

BPD:

biparietal diameter

AC:

abdominal circumference

FL:

femur length

EFW:

estimated fetal weight

MTLM:

mid-thigh lean mass

MTFM:

mid-thigh fat mass

AFM:

abdominal fat mass

SSFM:

subscapular fat mass

SEIFA IRSD:

socio-economic indexes for areas index of relative socio-economic disadvantage

IQR:

interquartile range

References

  1. Dodd JM, Grivell RM, Nguyen MA, Chan A, Robinson JS. Maternal and perinatal health outcomes by body mass index category. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51(2):136–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalliala I, Markozannes G, Gunter MJ, Paraskevaidis E, Gabra H, Mitra A, et al. Obesity and gynaecological and obstetric conditions: umbrella review of the literature. BMJ. 2017;359:j4511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Abenhaim HA, Kinch RA, Morin L, Benjamin A, Usher R. Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;275(1):39–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, Lau J, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obesity Rev. 2007;8(5):385–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. A Picture of Overweight and Obesity in Australia 2017. Canberra ACT; 2017. Report No.: PHE 216.

  6. Dalenius K, BP, Smith B, Reinold C, Grummer-Strawn L. Pregnancy nutrition surveillance 2010 report. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012.

  7. Scheil WJK, Scott J, Catcheside B, Sage L, Kennare R. Pregnancy Outcome in South Australia 2014. In: Government of South Australia, editor. Pregnancy outcome (statistics) unit SH. Adelaide: SA Health; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, Wadsworth J, Joffe M, Beard RW, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(8):1175–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg TJ, Garbers S, Chavkin W, Chiasson MA. Prepregnancy weight and adverse perinatal outcomes in an ethnically diverse population. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 1):1022–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cedergren M. Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(2):219–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman MD, Goodyear SM, Leith WM. A multistate population-based analysis of linked maternal and neonatal discharge records to identify risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus injury. Int J Gynaecol Obstetrics. 2017;136(3):331–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Callaway LK, Prins JB, Chang AM, McIntyre HD. The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population. Med J Aust. 2006;184(2):56–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Doherty DA, Magann EF, Francis J, Morrison JC, Newnham JP. Pre-pregnancy body mass index and pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstetrics. 2006;95(3):242–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitsantas P, Gaffney KF. Risk profiles for overweight/obesity among preschoolers. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(9):563–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rooney BL, Mathiason MA, Schauberger CW. Predictors of obesity in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood in a birth cohort. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(8):1166–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jharap VV, Santos S, Steegers EA, Jaddoe VW, Gaillard R. Associations of maternal obesity and excessive weight gain during pregnancy with subcutaneous fat mass in infancy. Early Hum Dev. 2017;108:23–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman S, Berkey CS, Field AE, Colditz GA. Maternal gestational diabetes, birth weight, and adolescent obesity. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):e221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. i-WIP Collaborative Group. Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2017;358:j3119.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dodd JM, Cramp C, Sui Z, Yelland LN, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, et al. The effects of antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese on maternal diet and physical activity: the LIMIT randomised trial. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Poston L, Bell R, Croker H, Flynn AC, Godfrey KM, Goff L, et al. Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(10):767–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):2003–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hjorth-Hansen A, Salvesen O, Engen Hanem LG, Eggebo T, Salvesen KA, Vanky E, et al. Fetal growth and birth anthropometrics in metformin-exposed offspring born to mothers with PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(2):740–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dodd JM, Louise J, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, Dekker G, McPhee AJ, et al. Effect of metformin in addition to dietary and lifestyle advice for pregnant women who are overweight or obese: the GRoW randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(1):15–24.

  24. Health SA. In: Health S, editor. South Australian perinatal practice guidelines: Normal pregnancy, labour and Puerperium management. Adelaide, South Australia: SA Health, Government of South Australia; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nisbet D, Robinson H, Halliday J, de CL. Australian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM) Policy Statement on normal ultrasonic fetal measurements. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(1):101–3. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.111_5.x. PMID: 11926635.

  26. Hui L. Australian charts for assessing fetal growth: a review. ASUM Ultrasound Bulletin. 2008;2008:12–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. 1984;150(2):535–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Owen P, Harrold AJ, Farrell T. Fetal size and growth velocity in the prediction of intrapartum caesarean section for fetal distress. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(4):445–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gardeil F, Greene R, Stuart B, Turner MJ. Subcutaneous fat in the fetal abdomen as a predictor of growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(2):209–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Larciprete G, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Novelli GP, Parretti E, Altomare F, et al. Fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCTT) in healthy and gestational diabetic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(6):591–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bernstein IM, Catalano PM. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal body composition for children of diabetic mothers. Investig Radiol. 1991;26(8):722–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hill LM, Guzick D, Boyles D, Merolillo C, Ballone A, Gmiter P. Subcutaneous tissue thickness cannot be used to distinguish abnormalities of fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(2):268–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grivell RM, Yelland LN, Deussen A, Crowther CA, Dodd JM. Antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese and the effect on fetal growth and adiposity: the LIMIT randomised trial. BJOG. 2016;123(2):233–43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/471-0528.13777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Poprzeczny AJ, Louise J, Deussen AR, Dodd JM. The mediating effects of gestational diabetes on fetal growth and adiposity in women who are overweight and obese: secondary analysis of the LIMIT randomised trial. BJOG. 2018;125:1558–66.

  35. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). In: Statistics ABo, editor. . Australian Capital Territory: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rowan JA, Rush EC, Obolonkin V, Battin M, Wouldes T, Hague WM. Metformin in gestational diabetes: the offspring follow-up (MiG TOFU): body composition at 2 years of age. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(10):2279–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lovvik TS, Carlsen SM, Salvesen O, Steffensen B, Bixo M, Gomez-Real F, et al. Use of metformin to treat pregnant women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PregMet2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(4):256–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chiswick C, Reynolds RM, Denison F, Drake AJ, Forbes S, Newby DE, et al. Effect of metformin on maternal and fetal outcomes in obese pregnant women (EMPOWaR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(10):778–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH, Balani J, Hyer S, Akolekar R, Kotecha R, et al. Metformin versus placebo in obese pregnant women without diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(5):434–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dodd JM, Turnbull D, McPhee AJ, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, Yelland LN, et al. Antenatal lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial. BMJ. 2014;348:g1285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Stephenson J, Heslehurst N, Hall J, Schoenaker D, Hutchinson J, Cade JE, et al. Before the beginning: nutrition and lifestyle in the preconception period and its importance for future health. Lancet. 2018;391(10132):1830–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Barker M, Dombrowski SU, Colbourn T, Fall CHD, Kriznik NM, Lawrence WT, et al. Intervention strategies to improve nutrition and health behaviours before conception. Lancet. 2018;391(10132):1853–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sovio U, Murphy HR, Smith GC. Accelerated fetal growth prior to diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):982–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The following institutions participated in the recruitment of women to the trial:

Women’s and Children’s Hospital (229 women); The Lyell McEwin Hospital (238 women); Flinders Medical Centre (57 women); and the University of Adelaide.

The following people performed research ultrasounds for the GRoW trial: Grivell R, Poprzeczny A, O’Brien C, Raghoudi E, Waterfall H.

We are indebted to the 524 women who participated in the GRoW randomised trial.

Funding

The GRoW randomised trial was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant (ID 1043181). Jodie Dodd is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (ID 1078980). The funding body did not have a role in the design or running of the trial, or the final analysis of results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Amanda J. Poprzeczny, Jennie Louise, Andrea R. Deussen & Jodie M. Dodd

  2. Department of Perinatal Medicine, The Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Women’s and Babies Division, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Amanda J. Poprzeczny & Jodie M. Dodd

  3. The University of Adelaide, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006, Australia

    Amanda J. Poprzeczny

  4. The University of Adelaide, School of Public Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Jennie Louise

Authors
  1. Amanda J. Poprzeczny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennie Louise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea R. Deussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jodie M. Dodd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Each author fulfils the requirements for authorship. JMD and ARD were involved in the study concept and design of the trial, supervision of conduct of the trial and acquisition of data. AJP, JL, ARD and JMD, have been involved equally in the development of the concept of this secondary analysis, analysis and interpretation of data, critical review of the manuscript, and provide approval of the final submitted version. JL was responsible for conducting the statistical analysis. AJP drafted the manuscript, had full access to all of the study data, and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data, and the accuracy of the data analysis. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda J. Poprzeczny.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Study protocol was approved by the Women’s and Children’s Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/ 12/WCHN/114), with local institutional approval at each site. Written informed consent was obtained from all women who agreed to participate in the trial.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The GRoW randomised trial was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant (ID 1043181). Jodie Dodd is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (ID 1078980).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1.

Effect of adjuvant antenatal metformin treatment on fetal biometry z-scores across pregnancy. Supplementary Table 2. Effect of adjuvant antenatal metformin treatment on fetal biometry velocities across pregnancy.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poprzeczny, A.J., Louise, J., Deussen, A.R. et al. Effect of metformin in addition to an antenatal diet and lifestyle intervention on fetal growth and adiposity: the GRoW randomised trial. BMC Endocr Disord 20, 139 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12902-020-00618-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12902-020-00618-0

Keywords

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us